Chapter 1: The Ancestral Hominid Lineage

The story of evolution begins long before the emergence of the first hominid. To gain a clearer perspective, let’s delve into the journey of life that has unfolded over millions of years.

The symbiotic relationship of life has developed gradually, with each cell playing its part in the evolution of every individual. To grasp this concept, we need to explore the scientific realm briefly, particularly focusing on primates. This will reveal the patterns of evolution reflected in our own systems and biology.

Let’s consider a primate within the evolutionary chain leading to humans. Imagine that a mutation arises within this primate, which will then propagate through reproduction.

Do you believe this mutation will lead to the development of a new species?

Based on a study from 2012, current primates reproduce at an average rate of 1.9 offspring per female annually. This varies significantly across species, from 0.5 for gibbons to 4.2 for lemurs.

Interestingly, the average lifespan of primates is higher than that of many other mammals. A 2008 study noted that primates typically live around 26.3 years, though this lifespan ranges from 13.8 years for marmosets to 49.6 years for long-nosed macaques.

Considering that medium-sized primates, such as chimpanzees, form groups of 50 to 100 individuals, geneticists estimate that a single genetic mutation can spread throughout such a family in approximately 7,500 to 10,000 years.

Scientists contend that a mutation requires propagation through a population of at least 500 individuals to become established. Some researchers propose even higher thresholds, suggesting tens of thousands are needed for significant evolutionary change.

Next, we must also account for the 'benefit' of this mutation, without neglecting the existence of degenerative mutations. Factors such as population propagation rates and natural selection coefficients play crucial roles in this complex process.

It suggests that around 5,000 major mutations could have occurred to transition from primate to Homo sapiens. These mutations would influence body size, shape, behavior, intelligence, and resistance to diseases over the analyzed 40–50 million years.

Strange, isn't it? Fewer than 5,000 mutations...

An important concept in evolutionary biology is "reproductive isolation." This can be triggered by geographical changes, like a river's course shifting, or by biological factors such as mating behaviors.

Following this, genetic differentiation occurs, influenced by mutations or natural selection, ultimately leading to species that either thrive or face extinction.

The pathway to Homo sapiens is far more intricate than one might assume, with each step taken by individual primates throughout this evolutionary saga. Interestingly, studies indicate that modern humans carry a genetic legacy of 2–4% from Neanderthals.

Next, scientific consensus holds that modern human genetic diversity can be gauged by allele frequency, representing the percentage of individuals within a population that possess a specific allele. Studies show significant variations in allele frequencies across human populations, hinting at a rich genetic tapestry.

Another measure of genetic diversity comes from the count of genetic mutations, which serve as indicators of a population's age.

Interestingly, rough estimates suggest that Homo erectus accounts for about 20-25% of the genes in modern humans, alongside other ancestral legacies like that of the Neanderthals.

Research has revealed that modern humans exhibit a relatively low rate of genetic mutations, implying that our population is comparatively young, with most mutations manifesting prior to what we deem the 'modern condition.'

In summary, genetic diversity in Homo sapiens is estimated to be around 10%, indicating that roughly 10% of the human genome varies from one individual to another.

Thus, we can now transition to a chronological overview of the details regarding our ancestral lineage!

The earliest evidence of mammals that would evolve into primates dates back approximately 50 million years, with species like Natharctus Tenebrosus emerging in an environment conducive to dense jungles rich in food sources.

One crucial trait shared among early mammals was their climbing abilities, paired with hand structures suited for grasping. This adaptation is a defining feature that correlates with the primate lineage.

Some researchers place the origins of our ancestors at around 30 million years ago. The primates significant to human evolution are grouped under the classification 'Homininae.'

However, the path ahead is lengthy. If we were to condense these 30 million years into a single year, the journey from ape to human would span from January 1 to December 28. The major migration of modern humans that led to the global dispersal of Homo sapiens would occur on the morning of December 31.

In terms of scientific references, the 'first step towards Homo sapiens' is often attributed to the so-called 'Purolopithecus,' which existed around 30 million years ago in the tropical forests of what is now the Mediterranean region.

This primate was almost ape-like and lived in trees, but due to its larger size, it developed bipedal locomotion to navigate the thick branches more effectively.

As social structures began to form, these early primates engaged in behaviors such as creating sleeping areas in trees, which fostered the development of social rules based on empathy and cooperation.

It is believed that the increased security provided by social groups also gave rise to prolonged sleep, crucial for brain function and development.

Do you think these deductions lack foundation? We are discussing an evolutionary timeframe of roughly 20 million years. For comparison, gorillas emerged 8-10 million years ago, while chimpanzees appeared around 6-8 million years ago from the same primate lineage.

How do you think gorillas or chimpanzees will evolve over the next 10 million years, considering they already exhibit behaviors akin to those of Purolopithecus?

This 20 million year period between Natharctus and Purolopithecus marks the time when hominid primates lost their tails—a remnant of which exists in the form of the coccyx at the base of our spine.

Not only this 'remnant' serves as a record of our primate past, but it highlights the evolutionary adaptations that occurred due to group living and environmental changes.

Life in trees necessitated a change in eye structure and color perception around 23 million years ago, as the need to identify food, primarily fruit, became crucial.

Current studies indicate that many modern primates have a limited color vision due to a reduced number of opsins, with humans having three types compared to one or two in other primates.

This limited perception is a result of both the reduced opsins and the brain's adaptation to process the information received through them.

Experiments on monkeys have shown that the introduction of additional opsins can enhance their visual perception, but this requires a period of adaptation.

Furthermore, genetic studies reveal that the number of opsins in the human eye results from a duplication process in DNA, leading to our ability to perceive a full range of colors.

However, this enhancement in vision seems to have coincided with a decline in olfactory capabilities, as vision became the primary source of information for human beings.

This phenomenon is evidenced by the presence of approximately 600 odor-related genes in humans that are now inactive, a testament to the "use it or lose it" principle of evolution.

Chronologically, major tectonic shifts around 10-11 million years ago significantly altered habitats, leading to the vast deserts of the Sahara and the migration of proto-hominids into Asia and Europe.

This transition heralded the emergence of Sahelanthopus, the first hominid to adapt to both arboreal and terrestrial life.

As a result, bipedalism became more pronounced, and the use of tools increased, leading to enhanced social interactions and evolutionary developments.

For instance, the bipedal posture necessitated new approaches to intimacy, resulting in the widespread practice of courtship among these early hominids.

These observations support the notion that the lives of these hominids were deeply intertwined with forest ecosystems, fostering complex social relationships that adapted over generations.

It appears that during this era, the utilization of primitive tools led to organized aggression, which we now recognize as warfare.

As proto-hominids began to comprehend the concepts of death and loss, it is likely that the first burial rituals emerged, a practice still observed in modern chimpanzees.

While these assertions may seem speculative, comparative assessments suggest that the brain size of these early proto-hominids was akin to that of contemporary primates, indicating they were not significantly less intelligent.

Nevertheless, tropical ecosystems continued to change, leading to a gradual depletion of forests over the next 10-11 million years, with the Sahara desert separating northern Africa from central and southern regions.

Only 7 million years ago did we witness the first signs of grass, heralding the rise of savannas that prompted early primates to adapt to this new environment, transitioning towards a predominantly terrestrial lifestyle while maintaining arboreal refuges.

This shift triggered the evolution of hominids, marking a truly explosive phase in their development.

Genetic determinations now clarify a distinct evolutionary divergence between modern humans and apes, allowing us to identify the precursors of 'Homininae.'

The earliest known member of 'Homininae' is 'Orrorin Tugenesis,' discovered in 2000 in Kenya, dating back 5.7–6.1 million years. This species was similar in size to a chimpanzee but exhibited traits indicating it could walk upright as well as climb trees.

The discovery of Orrorin significantly impacted our understanding of early human evolution, demonstrating that bipedality developed much earlier than previously thought.

This finding underscores that human evolution does not solely follow the line of Australopithecines or Ardipithecines but rather exists within a symbiotic or parallel evolutionary trajectory.

In this context, we must also acknowledge the discovery of Sahelanthropus tchadensis in Chad, which lived approximately 6-7 million years ago and exhibited both bipedal and primitive characteristics.

The fossils of Sahelanthropus have crucial implications for our understanding of early human evolution, suggesting bipedalism developed earlier than previously recognized.

From the Ardipithecine lineage, we should also consider Ardipithecus Ramidus and Ardipithecus Kadabba, both of which lived in the Affar depression of Ethiopia around 4.4 and 5.6 million years ago, respectively.

These species displayed clear adaptations for arboreal life yet exhibited early signs of bipedalism, further complicating our understanding of the evolution of walking upright.

Their diet consisted predominantly of plant products, similar to that of modern monkeys, but they were likely more terrestrial in their feeding habits. The development of their wrist bones may have been influenced by their gathering diet and the early use of primitive tools.

There is also evidence of a rich social life among these species, with indications that offspring matured rapidly, reaching adulthood by the age of 7–8 years.

Studies suggest clear evidence for the emergence of articulate language among ardipithecines, showcasing advanced vocalizations compared to modern primate communication.

Moreover, their lower limb specialization indicates a predominantly bipedal gait, marking them as neither fully ape nor human. This suggests that bipedalism did not solely arise as a response to open environments but was already present in forest habitats.

Finally, it is crucial to note that ancestral hominid fossils have predominantly been discovered in Africa, a region that has remained relatively untouched by human development, allowing for a clearer understanding of our evolutionary roots.

However, in other geographical contexts, human evolutionary lines must be considered in light of earlier migrations and subsequent adaptations that led to independent evolutionary developments.

Although much remains to be explored and discussed, this marks the beginning of the proto-hominid lineage, recognized by the scientific community as our undeniable predecessors.

Merticaru Dorin Nicolae

This material is part of a forthcoming book I am developing here on Medium titled "Beginnings." If you appreciate my work, please consider subscribing to my email notifications on Medium. Thank you!

If you find value in my efforts and wish to support future projects, please consider donating "A Stripe Free Diaper" (approximately 5 USD or 5 EUR or any amount you prefer), or subscribe to my email notifications through Medium. Thank you!

From my work here, you can also access papers such as "The New (Old) Paradigm of New Medicine" and "Hypothesizing One's Soul." Thank you!